But medically assisted death is not new. It has been present and debated since at least Greco-Roman antiquity and probably much earlier. However, its current status in various countries and within them is fraught with controversy even after legalization. For their involvement, euthanasia providers have been celebrated – and they have gone to jail. They have been portrayed as heroes or as villains, prominent among them American pathologist, Jack Kevorkian (1928-2011). Sometimes, health care workers are wrongly accused of killing their patients, especially when an unusual cluster of deaths arises – one example being the vicious prosecution of Canadian pediatric nurse Susan Nelles in 1981 for having murdered unhealthy neonates. She was later vindicated, absolved of all blame.  

Yet those of us who have worked with seriously ill people on the hospital wards know that a therapeutic choice to help suffering can run the risk of shortening those few remaining days. I recall more than half a century ago, a diminutive, elderly patient, writhing in agony on her bed. A much-respected senior clinician on his rounds demanded to know why we had not given “enough” morphine. “But chief!” we protested, “to raise the dose could stop her breathing!” “Why are you giving morphine?” he asked. “To relieve the pain.” “Have you succeeded?” “No.” “Then give enough; enough to make her comfortable” We did. She stopped moaning and died soon after. Unforgettable. We realized that decisions like this must be happening everywhere, but they occur within a cloud of trepidation, as bereaved family members might choose to make accusations. 

Prior to Canada’s 2016 legalization of medical assistance in dying (MAiD), people seeking help to end their lives with dignity would sometimes go to Switzerland. There, providing assistance to a person able to voluntarily self-administer lethal drugs had been legal (with variations) since the 1940s. In 1998, the Swiss non-profit organization Dignitas was founded to offer assisted death (or assurances thereof) to its members. In 2010, 89-year-old Kay Carter of Vancouver, who was suffering from spinal stenosis, went to Switzerland to end her life. It seemed outrageous that “death with dignity” was available to citizens who could afford to leave the country– yet everyone else was deprived. After her death, the Supreme Court decision that struck down Canada’s law against assisted suicide is known as “Carter vs Canada.” Considering that ordinary suicide had been illegal in Canada until 1972, these changes reflect a remarkable and relatively rapid shift in attitudes to death and dying.  

But the controversies are not over. And Canada is far from alone. Religious objections can be found in many communities. Vulnerable and disabled people together with their caregivers worry that they could be targeted or urged to accept assisted suicide by institutions wanting to save money. The prohibitions on access for children or the mentally ill are repeatedly challenged and have been overturned in some jurisdictions. Psychiatrists argue that assisted suicide would rarely be contemplated if more mental health services were available. Palliative care doctors resent the implication that they should be the administrators of euthanasia; they saw themselves as purveyors of comfort for life, not death. They pointed to the World Health Organization emphasis on the global need for more palliative care, and they complained that the new law made patients even more hesitant to accept their help. Swirling throughout these debates is the well-intentioned question about how a society should treat the least of its members: humane treatment or humane killing. 

It is scarcely surprising, then, Assistedlab.ch comes out of Switzerland; nor is it surprising that it finds a rich supply of sources. Launched in 2023, it claims to be “a living archive of assisted dying” that strives neither to endorse nor criticize the movement. Led by Anna Elsner, a professor of French Culture and Medical Humanities at the University of St Gallen whose 2011 doctorate from Cambridge focused on mourning in the work of Marcel Proust. Her polyglot team includes three other investigators and a manager, all with doctorates in either history or literature, all with Swiss affiliations. They are supported by ten assistants, mostly graduate students, seven from Canada and one each from the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. They rely on an advisory board of four distinguished scholars from Montreal, Glasgow, London, and Garrison, New York (the Hastings Center).  

Funded in part by a starting grant from the European Research Council for five years (2023-2028), assistedlab.ch also acknowledges support from several other universities. It is active on Bluesky with 1400 followers and, in mid-2025, launched a newsletter to feature the latest entries and events of interest. 

Aside from its specific subject-matter, assistedlab.ch has many features in common with our own Medhum, the most obvious being the preparation of reviews by team members. The site is plain but attractive and color-coded for analysis of textual, performance, visual and audio sources, the majority being textual sources. Each menu entry sports a black and white image, which sometimes turns to color upon clicking. The sources – fiction and non-fiction books, short stories, essays, films, plays, artwork, podcasts, memoirs, news reports, and farewell letters from the recently deceased. Most sources are linked from the articles describing them, most from recent decades but some dating back to the 1990s. A bibliographic list of further reading in print or other media accompanies each entry. Keyword tags and an efficient search function make exploration easy. 

At the time of writing, assistedlab gathers more than a hundred articles, all in English, although the works examined can be in other languages. In addition, a news section, similarly color-coded, provides information about upcoming and recently past events: lectures, theatre, conferences, workshops, interviews and new publications. Thoughtful description takes precedence over hyperbolic criticism or praise, making the site welcoming for anyone approaching this dire matter with curiosity for themselves or their loved ones in terms of personal or professional life. It will be fascinating to learn usage statistics for assistedlab.ch, not only the numbers, but also the geographic origins and user traits, for it should serve a wide array of human beings as we wrestle with the most fundamental of existential questions facing us all.  

Web image from Assistedlab.ch.

From the closest bus stop, the shift in focus is immediately apparent. A walk along the Avenue de la Paix (Peace) takes one past sculptor Daniel Berset’s monumental broken chair statue, conceived to encourage a multi-national ban on anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions. In the background, stands the European headquarters of the United Nations in the beautiful Palais des Nations (originally built in 1929 to house the League of Nations). A bit farther on, a statue of Gandhi greets passers-by, adorned one recent day with tributes to the late Russian political activist and prisoner, Alexei Navalny.  

The Red Cross/Red Crescent museum itself sits at the foot of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) headquarters, a large white building atop a hill. A modern glass and steel structure houses the collection where visitors are invited to learn more about the organization’s origins, as well as the long-standing alliance between individual Red Cross and Red Crescent national societies that provide humanitarian relief around the world. 

While the organization of exhibits in the museum’s permanent collection is not strictly chronological, a sculptor’s dramatic all-white rendering of Henri Dunant seated at a desk—and accompanying text—explains the Geneva resident’s role in the founding in 1863 of what is now the International Red Cross. Dunant, who was first inspired to create a relief effort to alleviate the suffering of soldiers after witnessing the 1859 battle of Solferino, Italy, also participated in the framing of the original Geneva Convention of 1864. On display in a nearby case, copies of that document contain language that reflects the authors’ optimism, “Ambulances and military hospitals shall be recognized as neutral…Wounded or sick combatants, to whatever nation they may belong, shall be collected and cared for.” Subsequent versions that expanded on the protections outlined—thereafter referred to as the Geneva Conventions—were drafted respectively in 1906, 1929, and 1949, with the lattermost document still remaining in effect.  

To safeguard both those providing care and wounded soldiers, the Convention “established a universally protective symbol: a red cross on a white background.” (There has been some debate about whether the white cross on the emblem was intended to carry religious significance or was simply chosen as a readily recognizable symbol, i.e., the inverse of the Swiss flag.) A little more than a decade later, use of the red crescent—a symbol more readily recognizable to Muslim soldiers—was initiated, with formal adoption of this symbol in 1929. Today, the red crystal emblem is used by allied societies in regions where the population does not identify with the cross or the crescent.  

Throughout the museum, the response of the Red Cross and the Red Crescent to humanitarian crises around the world is documented through a variety of materials including photographs, artifacts, and facsimiles of official records. The experiences of survivors in more recent conflicts and natural disasters are brought to life through additional media, including music, graphic representation, and recorded testimony. A striking example is found in the Hall of Witnesses where visitors can sit face-to-face with greater-than-life-size videos of survivors describing their experiences—among them, a former child soldier, a civilian who lost his legs but now works with other amputees, and a woman who experienced multiple displacements from her home country. 

The youngest victims of conflict come into focus in a haunting display of photographs posted along the wall of a nearby room; the accompanying text explains that the children portrayed are survivors of the 1994 Rwanda Genocide. Separated from their relatives at such an early age many did not know their family identities, or even their own names, making reunification difficult and sometimes impossible.  

Fortunately, there is hope to be found as well. In the Restoring Family Links section of the museum, more testimony may be viewed and heard, describing instances in which families separated by conflict have been reunited by the Red Cross and Red Crescent. Stories of recovery and resilience, even among individuals who might have given in to despair, amaze and inspire. 

In another gallery, a display of artwork crafted by prisoners and made primarily from found materials serves as testament to the desire for creative expression among those who have yet to attain their freedom. Among these works: a locomotive made by a French prisoner in Germany in 1941; a set of playing cards drawn by a Moroccan prisoner held by the Polisario Front (a group seeking independence in the Western Sahara) in 1998; and a miniature palace put together by Lebanese prisoners in Israel in 1999. (A book of this artwork is available in the museum shop.) 

With not all threats to human dignity stemming from civil wars, nationalist movements, repressive governments and militia, the Red Cross and Red Crescent also work to prepare vulnerable populations for natural disasters. A small area of the museum is devoted to this work, while a newer threat, cybersecurity is addressed at the Data Detox bar, where a pick-and-choose your own cocktail metaphor is used to provide “…steps you can take to control your digital privacy, security, and wellbeing”; cards that summarize this information are available to take home. 

Leaving the exhibits behind, in the lobby of the museum, the departing visitor is reminded of the power of literature and art to communicate our moral obligation to alleviate human suffering, as well as our capacity to do so. A quote from Dostoevsky that runs along one wall recalls our universal responsibility to one another, while nearby, observers are invited to add their own bit of weaving to artist Zahrasadit Hakim’s tapestry-in-progress, an example of how the cumulative efforts of many changes, supports and enhances the whole. 

The Museum of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent
https://redcrossmuseum.ch/
Av. de la Paix 17, 1202 Genève, Switzerland.  

Photo of the Red Cross/Red Crescent museum from wikicommons